Arizona Supreme Court Utilizes AI-Generated Reporters to Provide News Coverage

This month, the Arizona Supreme Court made headlines when it announced its ruling in arson and DUI cases through two AI avatars rather than the traditional method of a judge or spokesperson. Named Daniel and Victoria, these virtual figures signify a new approach to communicating judicial updates to the public.

Communications Director Alberto Rodriguez, who designed their appearance and voice, believes this innovation offers a more efficient means of sharing news. “It’s really an opportunity for us to meet the public where they’re consuming their media,” he stated.

The AI technology has significantly reduced the time required to create video summaries, bringing down production from several hours to just a few minutes. Despite this efficiency, Rodriguez assures that human oversight remains essential.

“Every upload still requires a human touch,” he noted, emphasizing that the accuracy of information is paramount. Chief Justice Ann Timmer echoed this sentiment, clarifying that the language delivered by the AI avatars is written by the justices themselves.

She hopes this modern method will enhance public confidence in the judiciary. While Daniel and Victoria represent a novel use of AI in legal communication, Chief Justice Timmer reminds us that AI is already prevalent in legal research and document analysis.

However, the integration of AI into legal practice does raise concerns. Some instances have sparked controversy, such as a New York plaintiff attempting to employ an AI attorney, only to be halted by an appeals panel.

As AI’s role in the judiciary expands, so do worries about inaccuracies and fabricated cases. Timmer reassures the public that the Arizona Supreme Court is mindful of these risks.

“This AI is not generative,” she clarified, insisting that AI will never replace human judgment in judicial decisions.